The Online Photographer

Check out our new site at www.theonlinephotographer.com!

Thursday, March 01, 2007

Portraits of Scientists

H. S. Brown, Agassiz + Agassiz

Here in my home state, the Wisconsin Historical Society yesterday unveiled the online digitized archive of Increase Lapham's collection of carte-de-visite portraits of scientists. Lapham was a pioneering leading light of science and civilization in the area. WHS says of him, "He wrote the first book published in Wisconsin; made the first accurate map of the state; investigated Wisconsin's effigy mounds, native trees and grasses, climatic patterns, and geology; and helped found many of the schools, colleges and other cultural institutions, including the Wisconsin Historical Society, that still enrich the state today." (He also wrote our first work of forest conservation, with the characteristically wordy 19th-century title Report On the Disastrous Effects of the Destruction of Forest Trees, Now Going On So Rapidly in the State of Wisconsin, in 1876.) When Lapham would correspond with his fellow scientists around the country—sometimes sending samples and fossils through the mail—they would include cartes of themselves so they would know what each other looked like.

Shown above is a carte-de-visite photomontage double portrait of geologist and zoologist Jean Louis Rudolphe Agassiz (1807-1873), by Milwaukee photographer H. S. Brown. Agassiz founded the Museum of Comparative Zoology in 1860 and was a founding member of the National Academy of Sciences in 1863.

Agassiz was the subject of one of my favorite passages from Ezra Pound's ABC of Reading:

No man is equipped for modern thinking until he has understood the anecdote of Agassiz and the fish:

A post-graduate student equipped with honours and diplomas went to Agassiz to receive the final and finishing touches. The great man offered him a small fish and told him to describe it.

Post-Graduate Student: "That's only a sunfish."

Agassiz: "I know that. Write a description of it."

After a few minutes the students returned with the description of the Ichthus Heliodiplodokus, or whatever term is used to conceal the common sunfish from vulgar knowledge, family of Heliichtherinkus, etc., as found in textbooks of the subject.

Agassiz again told the student to describe the fish.

The student produced a four-page essay. Agassiz then told him to look at the fish. At the end of three weeks the fish was in an advanced state of decomposition, but the student knew something about it.

By this method modern science has arisen, not on the narrow edge of medieval logic suspended in a vacuum.

The ABC of Reading, 1934, New Directions edition, 1960, p. 17


Posted by: MIKE JOHNSTON, with thanks to Andy Adams

5 Comments:

Blogger shaggy dog pix said...

Hi, Mike. Great post. But, um, Ezra Pound seems to have made a small nomenclatural error (it had to be him, of course). In writing out the name of a species, only the genus name is capitalized. The first letter of the species epithet is lower case. So, "Ichthus Heliodiplodokus" ought to be " Icthus heliodiplodokus " (in italics, of course).

6:50 PM  
Blogger RobertoC said...

Hi Mike, I must say that I don't recognize science in the anecdote. Science is about active experimentation, not observation. Or, at least, if experimentation is not possible (you cannot create a supernova), you have to make selective observation based on some hypothesis. Just looking at a decomposing fish is not enough...

1:52 AM  
Blogger fivetonsflax said...

I partially disagree with RobertoC. Looking at the fish is not enough (surely one must smell it too), but it's through observation and experimentation, not necessarily systematic, that scientists learn enough to form hypotheses -- which are then proved or disproved by more formal means.

3:06 PM  
Blogger shaggy dog pix said...

Sooooo, 2 years after the original posting...In response to RobertoC and fivetons...what Agassiz was, evidently, trying to teach his student was Linnaean taxonomy, a branch of biology founded on careful observation and description. It doesn't rely on hypotheses and their testing at all. For that one needs to move on to phylogenetics.

Well, better late than never, right?

4:21 PM  
Blogger Peter said...

It's a classic rite of passage story.
Though small itself, it deserves 4 pages.

7:50 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home